1. Question : The following are examples of what an employer might ask of an employee
Student Answer: submit to random drug testing. allow phone calls to be monitored. allow access to the employee’s computer. All of these reasons
2. Question : A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if
Student Answer: it is necessary to stay in power. it is necessary to win the next election. it is necessary to do research on the opposition. it is necessary to maintain national security.
3. Question : Benjamin Franklin said that those who would give up their rights in order to be secure
Student Answer: deserve neither rights nor security. don’t have any rights. should not run for election. should not be allowed to vote.
4. Question : The doctrine of habeas corpus requires that
Student Answer: a person be given at least three phone calls. a person must be allowed to go free. a person must given reasons for being arrested. a person must be given a private cell.
5. Question : An employee might legitimately object to Internet restrictions if
Student Answer: Such restrictions prevent one from chatting on-line with friends. Such restrictions prevent one from accessing work-related material. Such restrictions prevent one from checking the baseball scores. Such restrictions prevent one from making restaurant reservations.
6. Question : A utilitarian analysis of immigration would consider
Student Answer: the wages paid to employees. the increased profit to the employer. the cost of social services (hospitals, schools, prisons). All of these reasons
7. Question : A frivolous lawsuit is one that is brought to court
Student Answer: for an excellent set of reasons. to aid in cyberterrorism. for no compelling or justified reason. by a lawyer who wishes to be a judge.
8. Question : “Mutually Assured Destruction” is a policy based on which game theory strategy?
Student Answer: Chess Tit for Tat Baddabing Checkers
9. Question : A “two-tier” compensation package
Student Answer: forces workers to work on different levels of a building. forces newer hires to accept different wages than older hires. forces workers to go on welfare. forces new hires to join a union.
10. Question : The Ford Pinto case demonstrated that
Student Answer: it was cost-effective in the long run to allow purchasers to die. it was cost-effective in the short run to allow purchasers to die. accountants should not be trusted. the Pinto was Ford’s best product.
